Jason Jung vs Daniel Cukierman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Jung vs D. Cukierman

Jason Jung

TPE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

856

C. Rank

841

114

Best Rank

339

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$350.6K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Daniel Cukierman

ISR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

856

C. Rank

841

114

Best Rank

339

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$350.6K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Jung 1 - 0 Cukierman

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jason Jung winning 2 and Daniel Cukierman winning 0. The last match between Jason Jung and Daniel Cukierman was at the Malaga Challenger, 28-06-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jason Jung getting the victory 6-2 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Jung	1
Cukierman	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Malaga Challenger(06-28-22)

Stats

Jason Jung

Daniel Cukierman

J. Jung vs D. Cukierman H2H Profile

J. Jung	Stats	D. Cukierman
$350,585	Career Prize Money	$0
55.35% (414-334)	Career Total W/L	56.11% (257-201)
1	Hard	0
8	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-2)

J. Jung vs D. Cukierman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jason Jung has won 46.12% of points on their second serve, while Daniel Cukierman has won 47.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jason Jung, in recent form, has won 48.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel Cukierman has won 42.00%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.54% and 22.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jason Jung has saved 52.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel Cukierman has saved 48.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jason Jung has won 22.22% of matches played (W/L 2/7), with Daniel Cukierman winning 23.53% (W/L 4/13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jason Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 308/223), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/26). Daniel Cukierman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 182/135), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Jason Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 22.22% of matches (W/L 2/7), where as Daniel Cukierman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 26.67% of matches (W/L 4/11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jason Jung winning 1 times and Daniel Cukierman being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jason Jung winning 2 and Daniel Cukierman winning 0.
The last match between Jason Jung and Daniel Cukierman was at the Malaga Challenger, 28-06-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jason Jung getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:52.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jason Jung has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.33 while Daniel Cukierman has played against players with an average rank of 324.41.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jason Jung has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel Cukierman has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jason Jung has converted 41.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel Cukierman has converted 23.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jason Jung vs Daniel Cukierman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Jung vs D. Cukierman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Jung	Stats	D. Cukierman
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
1	Aces (Total)	3
3	Total Double Faults	0
1:22:52	Average Match Time	1:22:52
64% (36/56)	1st Serve %	64% (36/56)
75% (27/36)	1st Serve Win %	61% (22/36)
60% (12/20)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (9/20)
57% (4/7)	Break Pts Won %	100% (1/1)
45% (25/56)	Return Points Win %	30% (17/56)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Jung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	1-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
R2 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
R1 Arthur WeberA. Weber	W	6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(6)	Stats
Suzhou Challenger - 20-10-2025
R1 James McCabeJ. McCabe	L	6-7(4) 6-4 6-2	Stats
Shenzhen Challenger - 13-10-2025
R2 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida	L	6-3 2-0 ret.	Stats

View All

D. Cukierman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, CAN-ISR 4-0 - 08-09-2025
Rubber 1 Gabriel DialloG. Diallo	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Genova Challenger - 01-09-2025
Q1 Federico BondioliF. Bondioli	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Como Challenger - 25-08-2025
Q1 Federico IannacconeF. Iannaccone	L	7-6(6) 7-5	Stats
Bratislava 1 Challenger - 09-06-2025
Q1 Matej DodigM. Dodig	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Skopje Challenger - 19-05-2025
Q1 Lilian MarmousezL. Marmousez	L	6-2 7-5	Stats

View All

J. Jung vs D. Cukierman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Jung	Stats	D. Cukierman
55.35% (414/334)	YTD Win/Loss	56.11% (257/201)
54.67% (949/787)	Sets Win/Loss	55.61% (575/459)
51.99% (8605/7946)	Games Win/Loss	52.78% (4905/4388)
58.00% (308/223)	Hard Win/Loss	57.41% (182/135)
49.21% (31/32)	Clay Win/Loss	55.56% (50/40)
50.93% (55/53)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (25/25)
43.48% (20/26)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
0.24	Aces Per Game	0.16
1949	Aces Total	733
0.2	Double Faults Per Game	0.24
1621	Total Double Faults	1082
1:12:48	Average Match Time	1:11:43
566.09	Average Opponent Rank	430.02
63% (25533/40298)	1st Serve %	63% (13860/21979)
68% (17485/25533)	1st Serve Win %	66% (9132/13860)
51% (7548/14765)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (3931/8119)
40% (1594/3943)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1158/2461)
39% (16005/40933)	Return Points Win %	43% (9545/22173)
38.89% (14/22)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
18.18% (2/9)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (2/3)	Cups W/L	35.71% (5/9)
46.25% (37/43)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/1)
53.93% (240/205)	Challenger W/L	45.63% (47/56)
69.59% (119/52)	Futures W/L	60.29% (205/135)
57% (409/720)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (253/449)
9% (2/22)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (1/2)
51% (122/241)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (43/92)
52% (113/218)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (62/125)
85% (416/352)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (254/223)
15% (416/64)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (254/30)
18% (331/61)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (203/33)